Sample report: an AI visibility check, screen by screen

AI visibility report · sample

Your company yourcompany.example

United States · English answers · 5 questions × 2 engines × 3 repeats

Named when buyers ask

4%

1 of 24 product-choice answers

Own domain cited

0%

0 of 24 product-choice answers

Rank among listed brands

#9

of 9 tracked

Answers collected

30/30

failures are shown, never counted as absences

Key findings

Your company was named in 1 of 24 product-choice answers (4%).
The most-named listed competitor was Competitor B: 18 of 24 (75%).
yourcompany.example was cited inline in 0 of 24 product-choice answers. The most-cited domain was competitor-b.example (14 answers).
30 of 30 planned answers were collected.

Share of voice

OpenAI: brands named in product-choice answers

Competitor A9/12 (75%)
Competitor B8/12 (67%)
Competitor C6/12 (50%)
Competitor D5/12 (42%)
Competitor E3/12 (25%)
Your company1/12 (8%)

Gemini: brands named in product-choice answers

Competitor B10/12 (83%)
Competitor F7/12 (58%)
Competitor C6/12 (50%)
Competitor G4/12 (33%)
Competitor H3/12 (25%)
Your company0/12 (0%)

Listed competitors only. A mention is not a recommendation.

Question by question

Product-choice questions

Named in answers, out of successful repeats. Question 1 is shown in full below.

Question	OpenAI	Gemini
What's a good tool to track tasks for a 30 person team? We're still on spreadsheets.	0/3	0/3
Recommend a task tracker under $10 per person a month.	0/3	0/3
Our tasks live in three spreadsheets and nobody knows what’s current. What do people use to fix this?	0/3	0/3
What are some alternatives to Competitor A?	1/3	0/3

Questions that name the company

Expected to mention the company; read the answers for what they say about it.

Question	OpenAI	Gemini
How much does your company charge per person a month?	3/3	3/3

Cited sources

Most-cited domains in product-choice answers

competitor-b.example (competitor)14/24 (58%)
competitor-a.example (competitor)9/24 (38%)
competitor-f.example (competitor)7/24 (29%)
competitor-d.example (competitor)5/24 (21%)
competitor-h.example (competitor)3/24 (13%)
yourcompany.example (you)0/24 (0%)

Inline citations shown in the answers. Pages on other sites cannot be changed by editing yours.

Change since the last comparable run

The first observation. After a change goes live, a re-measure under the same conditions adds this comparison.

Results reflect the selected questions and recorded measurement conditions. API observations are labeled separately from consumer-app checks. Visibility counts product-choice questions only; questions that name the company are reported separately.

One answer

Question 1, as each engine answered it.

The workspace keeps the full answer text, the pages cited in the answer, the sources consulted and whether the engine searched.

OpenAI API · Repeat 1 of 3 · Answer collected · Searched the web

What's a good tool to track tasks for a 30 person team? We're still on spreadsheets.

For a team of 30 that's outgrowing spreadsheets, these five are worth a look.

Competitor A Free trial up to 30 seats Linked its site
Competitor B Board and list views Linked its site
Competitor C Flat $6 per person a month Named only
Competitor D Built for teams under 50 Linked its site
Competitor E Timeline view, no setup fee Named only

Your company: Not mentioned in this answer
Cited pages: competitor-a.example
competitor-b.example
competitor-d.example

Gemini API · Repeat 1 of 3 · Answer collected · Grounded with Google Search

What's a good tool to track tasks for a 30 person team? We're still on spreadsheets.

Teams that size usually land on one of these.

Competitor B Free plan for small teams Linked its site
Competitor F Made for 20 to 60 people Linked its site
Competitor C Flat $6 per person a month Named only
Competitor G Checklists and recurring work Named only
Competitor H Imports straight from spreadsheets Linked its site

Your company: Not mentioned in this answer
Cited pages: competitor-b.example
competitor-f.example
competitor-h.example

Next 3 actions

Three candidates to review, each tied to evidence.

Included in weekly Monitoring. Your team confirms priority and facts before a draft becomes a published change. A missing mention does not establish a cause.

1
State the confirmed team size on the pricing page
Evidence: Question 1 asks about a 30-person team. The sample pricing page says “growing teams”, while the confirmed audience is 10 to 50 people.
Task: Review a draft that states the confirmed 10-to-50-person audience on your pricing page.
Done when: Approved wording is published at the recorded URL; the date and final text are saved.
Fix it for me: request a scoped quote
2
Make the confirmed per-seat price explicit
Evidence: Question 2 asks for a tool under $10 per person. The confirmed price is $8 per person a month; the sample page does not state the per-seat price.
Task: Add the confirmed billing unit and price to the draft, after checking that the price is still current.
Done when: A reviewer verifies the live price and billing unit against the confirmed facts.
Fix it for me: request a scoped quote
3
Review the sources buyers are being shown
Evidence: The sample product-choice answers cite competitor-b.example 14 times and yourcompany.example 0 times. Those counts show citations, not whether your company is listed on another site.
Task: Inspect the cited pages for relevance and accuracy. Record what is known before deciding whether a correction or listing enquiry is appropriate.
Done when: Relevant source URLs, findings and any proposed follow-up are recorded. Unknown listing status stays unknown.
Fix it for me: request a scoped quote

Improvement

From the evidence to a draft your team approves.

Confirmed product facts, set beside the answer and your public page.

Sample report · B2B software example

Observed: Both answers to question 1 named five task trackers for a 30-person team. Your company was not named, while competitors’ team sizes and per-seat prices were.
Page check: Your pricing page does not state the team size it is built for or the price per seat.
Improvement candidate Hypothesis: Review a draft that states the team size and per-seat price your team has confirmed on the pricing page.
Follow-up: Record the date the change goes live, then observe the same questions again under the same conditions.

A hypothesis, not a cause. A missing mention alone does not show why an answer left a brand out.

Confirmed facts compared with yourcompany.example/pricing
Confirmed fact	On yourcompany.example/pricing
Built for teams of 10 to 50	Not clearly found
$8 per person a month	Not clearly found
Imports spreadsheets	Stated

Current text

Task tracking for growing teams. Plans for every team.

Proposed text · version 1 · awaiting review

Task tracking for teams of 10 to 50. $8 per person a month. Imports spreadsheets.

The approver signs off this exact version. If anyone edits it after approval, it goes back to review. The draft can be copied or downloaded; publishing stays with your team.

Tracking

Record the change, then observe again.

Record the date the new pricing text went live, the URL and what changed.
Re-measure with the same questions, engines, models, repeats, market, language and search settings.
Compare the two observations. If any condition differs, the comparison says so and lists what changed instead of showing a trend.

A hypothesis, not a cause. A missing mention alone does not show why an answer left a brand out.

Start your free check How we measure

An AI visibility report, section by section.